Section 497 (1) Contempt of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 337A (ii) / 337F (i) / 337L (ii) / 452/34 Shuja sentence, disappearance and house tresspass guarantee, approval of prohibited clause In section 497 (1), the accused, along with the CR scope suspect, along with his co-accused, allegedly injured two of the accused lawyers who were involved in the alleged offenses under section 497 (1). Although the PC was corrected, the guarantee was a rule in such cases and prevention was an exception, but the parties were very closely related to each other and both the complainant and his father Lawyer The accused and his co-accused were attacked when the complainant and his father were at peace with the accused in his own home within a prima fee alleging that he and his accomplices. Demonstrated by the High Court in his favor, at the discretion of the arbitrator, that there was no universal principle. In cases where the prohibited clause contained in section 497 (1) was not attracted, bail must be obtained, the accused was recently arrested and in strange circumstances, the High Court granted bail. But the accused was refused release, but the bail was refused in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
