The plaintiff's claim for claimant's claim was that her sister, who was about 80 years years old and also an illiterate occupant, owned the agricultural land and a house and the defendants who were with her. There was no connection either way. The sub-registrar staff was executed in their own favor. While her older sister neither gave the gift nor took possession of the suit property to the defendants, and that the alleged gift was obtained by the defendants through fraud and misrepresentation, even until the woman did Together, the trial court and the appellate court verifying the gift date suit filed by the plaintiff in the life of the defendant together with the defendant challenged the judgment and review orders that the defendant alleged was a gift. Failed to prove the allegation because he failed to produce the slightest evidence to prove his claim otherwise The owner of the property also filed a civil suit for time to challenge the gift process, but as a result, the plaintiff, as his sister's special counsel, presented five witnesses to his death in connection with his death. The sister is the real heir and has been entitled to her share of the property from her estate. The gift process in favor of the defendants was a forged document in which the harmony of the two courts was found to be a fraudulent document, no interference was required as the lawyer for the defendants was in any way Failure to identify the invalid, in which the claim of the claimant was proved to be based on reasonable evidence;
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
