Sections 497, the Code of Conduct (XL V of 1860), Articles 409, 420, 468, 471 and 109 of the Federal Investigation Agency Act, 1974 (VIII of 1975), sections 4, 5, 8 (1) and 23 of the Electronic Crimes Ordinance (LXXII) 2007), Sections 4, 7, 8 and 9 guarantee dual records of fraud, refusal and fraud, retaining the accused was the chief executive of the licensed company for dealing in foreign exchange and The domestic remittances charged by his company were being received. Money was not sent to foreign destinations for transfers to foreign destinations, nor deposits were returned to the deposits, which were masters in the legitimate trade of foreign exchange and through fraud and corruption. To make money, entertainers care about the accused can not change the responsibility of his company employees because he showed that he is the sole beneficiary, there was record on the evidence that the accused himself was doing the affairs of the company. Was to create two records for his employees, which transactions to go to and which records to go to and It has been shown how to deal with the customers of this company and its company has been doing such business since 2003, and since its inception there have been fraudulent and fraudulent transactions. The number of victims against the accused was in the thousands and the Federal Investigation Agency has made a rough estimate of the illegal amount of 45 billion rupees. There was a cure for those who were innocent and involved. In such cases when in the case with good intentions
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
