In sections 2 (2 (b) and 324 Qatil Amad), before the planned murder of the evidence again, there was no evidence of tension in the relationship between the accused and the complaining party that he was accused of. Killed and injured the witnesses. The accused was sentenced to death, what sentence has the High Court upheld. The accused had a very close relationship with the complaining party and the two parties knew each other. There was no question of the witnesses having mistaken identities or false opportunities. The seriously injured witnesses specifically stated that the suspects had their Although the statements of the injured witnesses were recorded after a delay of 10 days, they were in an uncertain and unsafe condition after the incident and they were unable to make the injured statements. The doctor also treated the injured witnesses. - The High Court has correctly found that the accused had a trained relationship with the complaining party, which was the motive for the presence of al-Libi, which was raised by the accused. That he was in another city at the time of the incident was not supported by the evidence on record and as a result We also recovered arms. The crime was solely for the incident and he had already committed the murder, the prosecution had surpassed any suspicion and proved his case. The appeal filed by the accused was dismissed accordingly.
