Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KHALIQ versus GUL AFZAL KHAN

Article 188 Review of the judgment of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 52 The Supreme Court decision was not kept on record by the applicant on the basis of such documentary evidence. Such conduct and conduct were permissible. Cannot be granted because there were other stringent conditions in the review case which led to the attempt to keep the file in the absence of documentary evidence, with the court specifically informed about the relevance of such lost documents. Was not persuaded or that he had filed a review petition at the trial or any subsequent stage Prior to the hearing an attempt was made to re-file the matter, even in regard to the questions which were considered and the decision under consideration in the decision was made quickly.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2015

• DAYAM KHAN v. MUSLIM KHAN 2015 SCMR 222
• PUNJAB EMPLOYEES SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION, LAHORE v. M. H. CHALLENGE INDUSTRIES, SIALKOT 2015 PLC 226
• MUHAMMAD RAZA HAYAT HIRAJ v. The ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN 2015 SCMR 233
• Mst. JEWAN MAI v. State 2015 PLD 242
• Malik JAVAID IQBAL v. State 2015 PLD 250
• NATIONAL ASSEMBLY SECRETARIAT v. MANZOOR AHMED 2015 SCMR 253
• 2015 PLD 257 2015 PLD 257
• MUHAMMAD ARSHAD v. The STATE 2015 SCMR 258

All Supreme Court judgments of 2015 →

immigration advocates phone number from Gari Mori lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes