The suspicion of arrest against narcotics narcotics prosecution is not supported by a public witness prosecution case and a public witness said that he worked with police as a registrar on patrol duty. And when the undercarriage vehicle was stopped and searched, nothing was recovered from it, which led to it being called a witness and subsequently prosecuted. The public witnesses involved in the recovery of the addicts did not support the prosecutor's case, including evidence from other prosecution witnesses in this case, which created a good deal of fear in the recovery effect, and Thus serious doubts were raised, the benefit of which were not taken separately each and every evening and instead of a ray packet for chemical analysis, only one sample, weighing 10 grams, was isolated and the chemical was analyzed. Was sent to, and it was not even clear which packet the sample was separated from. Created serious doubts factor, which benefits the accused had been given permission to appeal and Drug Control Act of 1997 articles from the sentence and conviction of the accused under section 9 (c).
