Articles 2 302 (b) /, /, 444/34 4, 444 / & & & 6060 // 3434 Killings, attempt to commit murder, voluntarily committing robbery, joint domestic crime at night Remand to the case due to the strike The defendant's right to examine the prosecution's witnesses, who were regularly present in the trial court on each date of hearing and not in the absence of a defense lawyer. The trial court was obliged to appoint a defense lawyer or offer to examine the accused at state expense. Check with the witnesses or yourself to confirm this fact so it was not done. His case was subjected to prejudice because of the deprivation of the accused's right to investigate the prosecution's witnesses, without his lawyer being accused of missing his lawyer. At one stage the trial court had appointed a defense lawyer to defend the cause of the accused, who moved two petitions seeking cross-examination of material witnesses, but the trial court granted the first application. Did not decide and excluded the second examination of the chief without any examination which had no legal value. The accused did not have sufficient representation to cross-examine the witnesses and in the cases the convictions were kept separate and the case was tried. The hearing was held in trial court. Then provide the opportunity to examine these two witnesses for a fresh verdict and provide legal assistance if needed.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
