Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARSHAD versus STATE

Attempts to suspend section 262626, the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), section 324 sentence, the pistol was shot by the accused, no witness of the prosecution was charged with any injury, No charge was made under Section 324, PPC. Whether the accused was applicable or not was yet to be determined by the High Court but in the near future a significant appeal hearing was not possible and before the final appeal hearing could be final, the accused could face his full sentence. ? And he was released on bail under the circumstances

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. JAMEELA BEGUM 2010 CLC 1243
• BOOTA v. ALLAH RAKHI 2010 YLR 1246
• Mst. AZRA BIBI v. EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER EDUCATION, DISTRICT NAROWAL 2010 PLC(CS) 1247
• KHURSHID OIL MILLS, LAYYAH through Proprietor v. BANK OF PUNJAB through Branch Manager 2010 MLD 1250
• SHAFQAT ALI v. SENIOR MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE 2010 YLR 1252
• MUHAMMAD YASEEN alias MITHOU v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1253
• UHAMMAD SHABBIR alias CHAIRMAN v. State 2010 MLD 1255
• JAMIL AHMAD SHEIKH v. Ch. ZAFAR IQBAL 2010 YLR 1257

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

top civil advocates from Nilore lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes