Sections 2 and 3 of the General Clause Act (XX of 1897), Section 21 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Constitution, the Equity Land Petitioner, claimed that it was a transfer from the original allottee to valuable consideration, which it submitted Land was allotted in exchange for Rowe's claim. The defendants' possession of the land was the result of such allotment as a result of fraud and misrepresentation, according to the Revenue Record issued by the Indian Revenue Authorities and confirmed by the Pakistan High Commission. , The predecessor of the original Altiz had never emigrated and died in India for 26 years. 12 After consulting and investigating the Revenue and Settlement records of the 1991 Department, the cancellation of such allotment by the Chief Settlement Commissioner was based on fake and fabricated orders as there was no person in the name of the original allottee and that person was not actually present. Was in the name of Aloty. Or its predecessor never moved to Pakistan The Validity Settlement Authority may interfere with the allotment order obtained through fraud and misrepresentation The order obtained by fraud can be ignored only in the service authority. After being pressed, an authority is passed in order that it be entitled to vary, amend, add or withdraw the same transaction in the name of the allottee or the applicant. In law, the cruel order was legal. High Court dismisses constitutional petition dismissed r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
