Section 302 (b) Qatil-e-Amad Testimony Benefits of Suspicion After the murder of the complainant and other witnesses during the trial, only the present witness was acquitted in the case, whose presence was highly suspected, Because he had not given any reason for his presence on the spot, nor had he taken the injured body to the hospital nor the victim who died in the street to urinate at 7pm in the winter season. Was taken to the hospital but with the bathroom available. Dhuri, where he was sitting with others before the incident, has not been charged 22/23 years old, it has not been proven that eyewitnesses have sued him in a lawsuit to match his statement The previous statement was improved. Evidence, as his testimony did not prove from medical evidence, that no crime was recovered from the scene of the incident, the recovery of the pistol from the accused, though reported to be in the works. The prosecution's reports on the server's processing of G's condition, arrest and declaration warrants from the Franzic Science Laboratory were of no use, though the accused was not listed under Section 342, CRPC. Although the February indictment was a relevant fact, it could not be used for capital punishment alone, in the absence of reliable and certified ocular evidence, the defendant was acquitted on the benefit of the doubt in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
