Sections 5 and 12 (5) of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), a section 115 revision request for timely restitution, which sought to explain the delay, asserted that it once held regular hearings. Was modified for this, even then the threshold question cannot be considered. Prior to the final arguments and that it was not notified of the date of preparation of the certified copies by the transcribing agency, therefore, the limitation period will continue until it is ready to produce certified copies. When told about, any question was given to Waldetti Court. Regardless of whether such a question was exaggerated, including the question of law limitation at any time, the issue of limitation needs to be seriously dealt with before a dispute can be decided on the merit petitioner's position. He was not notified by the Wally Agency because he was misunderstood. The time required to obtain certified copies in section 12 (5), the Limitation Act, 1908, was excluded only. Two days that cannot be verified because Section 5 Civil Revision of the Limited Act 1908 could not be modified, it was removed due to time restriction \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
