Find a Lawyer

MUNIR AHMED versus STATE

Section 302 (b) Qatil Amad appreciating the evidence did not explain the delay in filing an FIR, about 23 days, medical evidence was not confirmed by the ocular account, the two accused on trial on the same evidence. The court was acquitted and no appeal was made. His fate was filed either by the complainant or by the state before the court for the weapons offense. Was found. Without prosecution, the prosecution failed to prove the case against the accused, the trial, suspicion and conviction and conviction of the accused were set aside under trial.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• Prof (Retd.) Dr. MUMTAZ HUSSAIN v. Dr. MAQSOOD HUSSAIN 2010 YLR 1916
• GOVERNMENT OF NORTH-WEST FRONTIER PROVINCE through Secretary Finance v. NATIONAL ELECTRIC POWER REGULATORY AUTHORITY, through Chairman 2010 CLC 1918
• SAMINA KANWAL v. DIRECTOR, PUNJAB FORESTRY RESEARCH INSTITUTE, GUTTWALA, FAISALABAD 2010 YLR 1920
• GHULAM AHMAD v. MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE 2010 CLC 1921
• MUHAMMAD ARSHAD v. State 2010 YLR 1923
• RIAZ JAVAID v. SHERAZ AHMED 2010 CLC 1925
• MUHAMMAD ARIF v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1926
• Malik AMANULLAH v. MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE 2010 YLR 1932

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

law firms from Bagh lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes