SAMINA KANWAL versus DIRECTOR, PUNJAB FORESTRY RESEARCH INSTITUTE, GUTTWALA, FAISALABAD
Article 199 Convention of Conduct (10 of 1984), Article 114 Punjab Contract Recruitment Policy, 2004 Constitution Appointment Agreement Appointment Contract Appointment, Applicant's termination contract entered into employment and was canceled without giving due notice. The terms included in the service were included in their appointment letter and they were reluctant to challenge the terms and conditions, the authorities were not obliged to provide their services in accordance with the Punjab Contract Recruitment Policy, 2004, or the appointment letter authority. Prior to termination, give notice to the applicant. The appointing authority exercised its powers under the Punjab Contract Recruitment Policy, 2004, terminating its services in lieu of one month's notice for payment of one month salary to the applicant, as per the terms and conditions of the appointment letter. It was a contractual appointment and both parties were legally bound to comply with the terms and conditions of the contract. The parties should maintain the integrity of the contract by post, against which the applicant was appointed purely on contract basis. Was no longer available to the applicant on a regular notice based on his service There was no right to claim that the Eight was regularized. Along with the contractual appointments, according to the Punjab Contract Recruitment Policy, the 2004 applicant had a reasonable and effective way of filing an appeal to the competent authority, which he had already benefited from, although his requests were rejected. Was.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
