In the case of a constitutional petition for the recovery of Article 5 and Schedule Constitution (1973), Article 199 dowry articles, Dover and restitution allowances in the Constitution of Pakistan, the plaintiff asserts that the plaintiff's alleged home was not transferred to her claimant. Was further claimed to have been compromised. The parties and the defendant paid the plaintiff a sum of Rs 1.5 million as the price of the land and dowry articles and the work was done to bring the plaintiff to his house, but she stayed with the defendant for only a week. And then the plaintiff left the house. For no reason, the trial court upheld the judgment from the articles of suit against the plaintiff for Rs. Dover or its value in the form of gold jewelery is Rs 200,000 and the appellate court dismissed the appellants filed by the defendant for Rs 200,000. And did not include the full transcript of the statement with the constitutional request. The plaintiff's testimony supported the plaintiff's claim that the plaintiff could not identify any judicial error or error under which the constitutional petition was rejected by the High Court in the decision of the two courts. \ R \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
