Find a Lawyer

MST. RASHIDA BIBI versus STATE

The definition of evidence in section (c) narcotics arrest can be done by a police officer legally as a complainant as well as an investigating officer, unless the accused is prejudiced against such action, Neither was it objected to. The relevant police officer, as a suggestion in the inquiry, dismissed the application of section 103, CRPC, through section 25 of the Control of Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997, There was no objection to the non-participation of any private witness in the recovery proceedings. Chemical examination of a witness or the accused to report the crime had proved positive and was retained in the conviction of the accused.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• ALLAH DITTA v. State 2010 YLR 889
• SHAHZAD KHAN v. State 2010 YLR 890
• Haji INAYAT ALI v. Haji REHMAT ALI 2010 MLD 894
• ASLAM MEHMOOD v. MEMBER (JUDICIAL-VII), BOARD OF REVENUE PUNJAB, LAHORE 2010 CLC 900
• Mst. SAJIDA BIBI v. BABAR KHAN alias NASIR JAMAL AHMED KHAN 2010 MLD 904
• FATIMA SUGAR MILLS LTD., FAZALGARH, MUZAFFARGARH through Chief Executive v. SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, FOOD DEPARTMENT, LAHORE 2010 YLR 904
• NISAR AHMAD v. DISTRICT JUDGE, LAYYAH 2010 CLC 905
• ABDUL SHAKOOR v. ABID HUSSAIN 2010 YLR 906

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

list of advocates from Kasur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes