Limited suit for damages of Articles 6, 7, Arts 14 and 36, suit for recovery of Rs. 76.50, claiming 639 special and general damages due to defects, misconduct and non-interference of the defendants. The eleven thousand KV lines of high tension lightning were left with lightning, and the electric shock caused the defendant to suffer badly and he suffered severe injuries. The defendant sued on the basis of the threshold and emphasized that The trial of the defendants was stopped from the time the trial court dismissed the case. Up to the amount of Rs 5,000,000, which covers both special and general damages, the defendants' position was that the complaint filed in connection with the incident by the defendants in Article 14 of the Limitation Act, 1908 Time spent following was not excluded. At the time of the Federal Ombudsman Accident, one of the plaintiffs was about three years old and was still a minor and was presumably subject to legal disability. It was held that the plaintiff had suffered a minority legal disability and the limitations of establishing this case could not be said to be prosecuted, in which case the plaintiff was. Entitled to the benefits of the provisions of section 7 of the Limitation Act, 1908, the plaintiffs were continually mistaken for the incident and the limitation period began to run at every moment during which errors were made by the plaintiffs. The appeal was not banned. The High Court rejected
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
