Find a Lawyer

MST. FATIMA BEGUM versus STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN

Section 123 widow of the insured petitioned before the insurance tribunal that her husband is a holder in a policy of Rs one lakh on non-medical grounds which the insurance company issued in his favor without medical examination. On request that the insurance policy was a policyholder obtained through a misrepresentation and pressing of facts the insurance company witness did not submit a written report of his investigation and upon examination the chief said that he was undergoing treatment at the hospital. In the absence of a written report or hospital record, the insurance company Cannot set up ni. Prior to the purchase of the alleged fraudulent conduct or concealment insurance policy, some facts in which the deceased company's witness did not even confirm any misrepresentation by the policy holder before purchasing the insurance policy were accepted by the High Court. Removed the unwanted decision and directed the insurance company to pay. Applicant's insurance policy \ r \ n \ r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• Syed AZHAR HUSSAIN v. MUHAMMAD ASLAM 2010 MLD 1162
• WAZEER AHMAD v. ABDUL GHANI 2010 MLD 1167
• WAPDA v. Qazi ZAKA ULLAH 2010 CLC 1169
• MUHAMMAD NAEEM v. State 2010 YLR 1170
• MUHAMMAD RIAZ v. State 2010 MLD 1172
• Rao DIL JAN KHAN v. DR. MUHAMMAD YOUNIS 2010 CLD 1175
• LAL DIN v. State 2010 YLR 1175
• MUHAMMAD SHAHID v. State 2010 YLR 1177

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

when you need a advocate from Pindi Bhattian lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes