Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD RIAZ versus STATE


Section 2302 (b) definition of evidence was according to the FIR and ocular testimony that the hatchet was used at the time, but the defendant, according to his post-mortem report, did not reach a single injury with a sharp weapon. The IR had never stated that the hatchet was used in the wrong direction, even though the firearms did not cause any injury to the victim, despite the large firearm, so, the ocular account and Medical evidence is available, after an delay of sixteen hours an FIR was filed. There were no eyewitnesses on the occasion. At the time of the incident, who was a false witness and had falsely implicated the accused in the case, the accused was acquitted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
female advocates from Kashmir lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.