Section 302 (b) definition of evidence, sentence was immediately reduced to FIR The contents of the FIR were fully endorsed by the complainant when the complainant as a witness of the prosecution The statement was controversial with the prosecution's statement. The witness who completely forged the complainant's line. And said that the two witnesses were supporting each other on almost all important aspects of the case, both witnesses were subjected to long interim investigations, but their statements did not bring the prosecutor to life. Could Apart from the contradiction of the two witnesses in connection with the injury to the victim's body, no contradiction was found in the statements of the two eyewitnesses, medical evidence was close to the statement of the prosecution witness who received credible support for the ocular part. ? The prosecution's testimony from the prosecution's testimony, however, was not evidenced by the prosecution's witness's statement of theft even though otherwise, the theft being a common household article, Can be easily inserted, without identification. The case of any individual prosecution, to the extent of the accused, as far as he is concerned, the ocular account and the motive, which was sufficiently supported by any medical evidence, were the culprits of the offense under Section 302 (). The conviction, which the PPC deemed unimaginable, was retained and the statement of the prosecution's witness in connection with the theft recovery was not affected by trust and only one on the suspect's chest when the prosecution's witness proved the crime. He was given a life sentence for theft.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
