Section 31 and 39 suits for sale are under dispute with some of the cases of measles on the request for review of the deadline, the trial was filed under section 39 of the Special Relief Act, 1877 in connection with both cases. ? The court and the appellate court jointly dismissed the litigation if there was a contradiction between the original position and the measles number, it was the clarification in the sale statement that would not prevail, nor did the original measles number bring sufficient evidence to the record. Went to Prove that the Plaintiffs occupied a landed building surrounded by enclosed walls and raised structures on the fact that in the sale deed, the wrong measuring number was mentioned, that the Plaintiff did not. Will not dispose of the residential property they own and have. Both the courts had looked into the matter carefully and the matter involved was that the scanning of the evidence through microscopic vision would have revealed the exact incident and interference with the jurisdiction was not possible under Section 115, CPC. The decision of the courts was not possible, and the decision was not possible to be rich in detail, it said in the review petition. Dismiss
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
