Sections 42-42 and 54 for the Case of Permanent Order Registration The plaintiff's jurisdiction filed a lawsuit for declaratory and permanent injunction that the plaintiff in the interest of the defendants had sold the plaintiff to the plaintiff in his favor. The registered sale was done. And that the plaintiff purchased additional land from the predecessor in the interest of the defendant, and that the defendants paid Rs 15,000 by check as a consideration of the contested claim on the basis that the alleged document was earlier levied. There was a note of interest. The defendants owned the entire property that was sold to the plaintiffs, it was a fake enhancement according to the defendants and was designed to exclude the defendants from inheriting the disputed property because the legal heirs were the defendants. The jurisdiction was challenged to entertain the jurisdiction. The trial court, hearing the case of the plaintiff A, filed the judgment against the court and the judgment was also dismissed by the appellate court. The disputed property was a residential property called confessional where the defendants built and occupied the residential house and it was not alleged anywhere that the alleged agricultural land in the register was the same as the sale was in writing and It was in the same sequence and it was a registered document that had the justification for it and that this assumption was not rejected by the defendants, the documentary evidence presented by the defendants was more reliable, reliable and Comprehensible was found in the evidence presented by the defendants as compared to that of Ben
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
