NOOR JAHAN versus JUDGE ANTI-TERRORISM COURT BAHAWALPUR
Crimes under Section 380/447/148/149 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 6, 7 and 23 of the Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Sections 156 and 159 of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Constitution. FIR was registered under Section 380/447/148/149, eight suspects were arrested during investigations by PPC with sections 6 and 7 of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 and when their remand papers were presented to the Judge Anti-Terrorism Court. On his way, he directed the removal of Article 6 and the Anti-Terrorism Act of 1997, after the witnesses' statements were recorded by the Anti-Terrorism Commission, which found out that the Anti-Terrorism Commission would find out. The words of the accused used in section 23 of the Terrorism Act did not create any element of terrorism or panic. 1997, it was very clear at that point that the court could pass an order after admitting an offense at the relevant time; the court, at the time of the approval of the immovable order, did not admit the offense and to eliminate the offense. There was no proper material available on record, in which case the matter was prematurely resolved, after which record of some evidence was directed to decide the matter after admitting the crime with the request of the court mind.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
