MUHAMMAD UMAR FAROOQ versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION SADDAR KAMALIA
In the constitutional application of Article 199 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), section 420/468/471/475, the petitioners demanded the termination of the FIR filed against them. That the facts stated in the F LR do not constitute the offenses involved. That there is no possibility of conviction of the nominees in the last phase of the trial. And that the relevant police station had no jurisdiction to file a case. In the present case, no such component was identified by the counsel of the applicants for canceling the FLR complaint and in the FIR it was It was stated that he had been tricked by the applicants. Generating fake documents, said that the facts needed proper investigation and that the investigating agency was for this investigation, that the High Court could not play the role of an investigating agency in the constitutional jurisdiction nor could the FIR use its constitutional authority. Could have eliminated them. And unless there were very unusual circumstances, which were not found in the case, if an offense was initially committed, the trial would normally be held in the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court. They should not be allowed to be ignored. Applicants have received multiple alternative remedies before the trial court under Section 249A, CRPC, if they were acquitted, the trial was not made before the trial court, or CRPC. Referring to the relevant magistrate for the cancellation of the case under the provisions, the High Court lacks jurisdiction to intervene in the matter under Article 199 of the Constitution in the presence of alternative alternatives.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
