The 28-hour delay in filing the FIR, complimenting Section 302 (b) / 34 Qatl i amd evidence, remained unclear and the trial was also adjourned, which is allegedly made in front of his house. He did not return home at night, but the complainant did not feel disturbed by his absence nor sought for his recovery, nor did the complainant and the prosecution testify about the prosecution. The suspects were contacted to find out and the fact that the deceased was not taken from his home in his presence. And later in the prosecution case, the victim was told to flush her house from the house, where the accused took the deceased to the excuse that the prosecution's witnesses could not explain the nature of the money dispute between the deceased. ? And for the accused to be charged with the confusing and suspicious nature of the suspects, a suspected incident could not be the basis for the conviction of the accused, presented by other prosecution witnesses, which was also fabricated evidence which I was told that there were prosecution witnesses. Medical evidence denied Prosecutors said the incident happened overnight, but said they did not care to provide information, either to the complainant or to the police quietly for so long. Indicated that they were not true witnesses, and that after the discovery of the dead body, the story would have been made and thus their existence would have been terminated. The body of the deceased was found and the suspect was not identified
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
