Find a Lawyer

MST. TABASSAM PERVEEN versus D.C.O.

Section 1 561A Panel Code (XLV of 60 X60 of), Section 9379/6 506/666 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition FIR Theft and Criminal Intimidation Applicant Grade 19 Working Woman Having been rejected as such, there would be no benefit to the trial in such cases, when the contents of the FIR do not show the commission of a serious crime, then in the above case there is no possibility of the applicant's conviction. ? Applicant's trial will result in increased applicant's distress, without consequence, dismissed

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• ASHIQ HUSSAIN v. JUSTICE OF PEACE, ALIPUR 2010 YLR 774
• MUHAMMAD SAEED v. State 2010 PCrLJ 775
• ZAHID MAHMOOD v. TAHIR AZIZ CHUGHTAI 2010 CLD 777
• MUHAMMAD NAWAZ v. MEMBER (CONSOLIDATION), BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE 2010 YLR 778
• MUHAMMAD AKRAM v. Mst. HALIMAN BIBI 2010 CLC 781
• DIN MUHAMMAD v. MUHAMMAD LATIF 2010 MLD 781
• NAUBAHAR ALI v. VICE-CHANCELLOR 2010 PLC(CS) 783
• MUHAMMAD SHARIF v. Hafiz MUHAMMAD ISMAIL 2010 CLD 784

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

property advocate from Jamshoro lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes