HUMERA NASEEM versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, BUREWALA DISTRICT VEHARI
Article 5, Schedule, Section 7 (3) and 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application suit for recovery of dowry articles, Family Court orders suit for recovery of dowry articles worth Rs 89000. The appellate court set aside a verdict, judgment and decree by the Family Court in connection with the collection of the dowry articles, the accuracy family court ruled in favor of the plaintiff as to the value of the dowry articles. It was decided in the amount of Rs. 000 that the respondents did not have any indications of the trial court in the list of articles of the dowry, there was no weight list when the opposition party. At the time of recording the statement of the plaintiff without the object was not displayed. And later on such an objection that the list could not be taken as admissible nor entertained if the list of dowry could not have been signed by the Presiding Officer, when the decision of the Family Court It was highly mentioned that it was exhibited. Because of the mistake of not signing the presiding officer, the party could not be prosecuted against the plaintiff while he was a witness during the court appearance, he did not mention the dowry articles given by his parents at the time of his marriage. Given the details, the High Court did not justify setting aside appellate court rulings and decree reversing the Family Court verdict and ruling of the Family Court in connection with the collection of 70 thousand rupees.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
