Section 302 (a) convicts convicted of evidence, the reduction in motivation behind the incident has been explained by the land dispute as well as the removal of shrubs from the boundaries of the deceased's property and the alleged complainant's principal. Purpose In the FIR and before the trial court complaining about the dispute between the parties, the prosecutor failed to prove that in the case, Ansar failed to prove that, in other circumstances, the eyewitnesses testified. Had also banished them. Since the complainant had given details of the events leading up to the murder of the tie dead as well as the motive behind the killing of the deceased witnesses, an accurate and consistent account of the incident was presented. The statements of the witnesses were in accordance. And according to all the material aspects of this case, some minor contradictions in the statements of witnesses with each other were slight in nature. Although there was a deep connection to the victim, the mere fact that the witnesses' relationship with the deceased had no basis for dismissing their evidence because the accused was the cousin of the accused was a crime for the complainant and others. There was no compelling reason to be falsely involved. The FIR was immediately logged in and the incident was a long day, no question of the suspect's misdemeanor or misidentification arose, the witnesses presented credible and faithfully impressive account of the incident. Who presented medical evidence presented by a doctor who performed a post-mortem examination. The body of the victim was similar to the location of the wounds, the use of weapons and the location.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
