NIZAM UD DIN THROUGH SPECIAL ATTORNEY versus NAZAR MUHAMMAD
Because of the declaration of section 39, 42 and 54 of the Civil Code (v. 1908), Title VII, R 11, and the filing of documents, the trial court refused to dismiss the plaintiff on the ground that the defendant was against the plaintiff. The reason for the action exists. The statement filed by the plaintiff was for a permanent injunction and the termination of the contract, which can be decided only after the recording of the evidence as there were certain facts which could be decided only after the recording of the evidence. There were some facts that were very controversial, even those that were alleged. The compromise agreement was controversial The dispute substance established the cause of action which was too high The defendant failed to identify any illegal or irregularities in the trial court-approved order.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
