MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB THROUGH COLLECTOR
Section 42 of the Punjab Confirmation of Proprietary Rights in the Preparatory Rights of Non-Proprietors Act of the Act (I 1995), Sections 3 and 5, for the claimant of these figures to be their owner, thereby canceling the allotment mutant in the name of the defendant. The trial court ruled that the case was upheld. The appellate court allowed the appeal and, in rejecting the trial court's order, the plaintiff could not establish his possession and my claim in the law's claim without a contradictory statement had no status. Was the owner of the second property, the New Proprietor Population Act of 1995 Laqeet property rights to benefit knfrmnt section 3 tips, unwanted decision was in accordance with law and order. No interference was sought for civil review
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
