MIAN MUHAMMAD ASIF versus S.S.P. OPERATION, LAHORE
Sections 156 and 173 of the Constitutional Code (XLV of 1860), Articles 420/467/468/471/193 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 give false documents using fraudulent, fraudulent documents and constitutional petition in this case I was re-investigated In 1998, after the city sub-registrar's record was litigated, the accused was challenged to seize valuable property and allegedly lost his loss number in the sales deed. And the government was deprived of this property, when the record of the City Sub Registrar was burnt in the year 1998 in burnt. The investigating officer found him innocent on the basis of the absence of any evidence and made his statement to the court at the hearing of the bail plea before his arrest, the FIR accused the High Court on the writ petition. Was shown. In the petition, he presented his affidavit with a photocopy of the said sale process, which disclosed the ownership of the said property to the central government, which was a documentary film. Evidence against the accused has been disclosed that under Section 173, the High Without the advice of the court record mentioned above, the CRPC was not signed by the relevant Section H, which violates the mandatory provisions of the Police Rules Investigation Officer. , Being in league with the accused, he had clearly declared Section CPP (Investigation) innocent, the circumstances which led to the investigation of the matter to the section headquarters, earlier through Section H The petition filed by the complainant for the transfer of the same challan submitted against the law and without any evidence has been collected again in this case.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
