Section 44 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O xxxxx, Rr 1 & 2 Interim Order Prohibition, Approval of Approval, Evidence of Local Commission Report Defendant's claim of fact by the courts below that of the shop owner But the defendants refused. Likewise, on the various requests of the parties, the trial court appointed a local commission for spot inspection; the trial court relied on the report of the local commission to grant interim injunction in favor of the plaintiffs. The orders appreciated by the defendants and the orders passed by both courts were based on convincing, rational and passionate reasons below. The defendants failed to identify any illegal interference or irregularity approved by the courts below and the main ingredient for a temporary injunction, namely the possession of the defendants, was entered on the site by the plaintiff's joint litigation owner. There was still a division that was still pending, in which the fact that their first case had been set up if the defendants' application was banned and if the provisional injunction was denied and the trial was kept If the trial court did not approve the order, then it was feared that the defendants would be in the hands of others. They can cause trouble by selling common property. Refused to interfere with the smooth orders passed by the High Court. Following review, two courts were dismissed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
