Find a Lawyer

ZULFIQAR HAIDER versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE

Section 28 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Appealing to Appeal as a party to the petitioner, it was filed to enforce the matter as its parties on behalf of which the Special Judge for the respondents. The lawyer for the (rental) validity dismissed the request. That it has no objection if the Constitutional application is disposed of with the direction of the appellate court to decide the matter and appeal on the adjudication thereof, the impugned order was fixed and this case will be decided within a fixed time. Was sent to the Appellate Court for.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• Mian MUHAMMAD ASIF v. MUHAMMAD KASHIF QURESHI 2010 MLD 933
• MOONDA v. FATEH MUHAMMAD 2010 MLD 934
• ALLAH DITTA v. MUHAMMAD SHAFI 2010 CLC 939
• BASHIR AHMED v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE 2010 YLR 940
• ALLAH DITTA v. State 2010 YLR 942
• Mian MUHAMMAD ASIF v. S.S.P. OPERATION, LAHORE 2010 YLR 944
• NAWAB DIN v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through District Collector/DOR Vehari 2010 CLC 945
• GHULAM YASIN v. D.S.P. 2010 PCrLJ 946

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

jobs for advocates from Muzaffargarh lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes