Find a Lawyer

MST. SAEED BIBI versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, JAMPUR, DISTRICT RAJANPUR

Article 5 and Schedule of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for recovering allowance for wife and minor son and dowry articles, the trial court sued the husband / defendant of the appellate court on the subject of dowry for the plaintiff. Appeal Failure to Appeal Failure to Receipt Receipts of Dowry's Articles The legitimate plaintiff denied that when she left her husband's home, she had taken the dowry articles to her parents' home because she did not receive the dowry articles. No matter, because neither the people in the villages demand shopping receipts nor the shopkeeper S Witnesses were willing to set aside the finding was that the appellate court had allowed the petition and the trial court \ restored this: \ r \ n \ r n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• MUHAMMAD ARIF v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1926
• Malik AMANULLAH v. MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE 2010 YLR 1932
• Syed SHAJJAR ABBAS SHAH v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1935
• SHAHNAZ BIBI v. State 2010 YLR 1937
• SHAH NAWAZ v. ABDUL RAZZAQ 2010 MLD 1939
• Hafiz MUHAMMAD SHAHID NAWAZ v. Hafiz MUHAMMAD SAEED 2010 CLC 1941
• MUHAMMAD ASIM alias BASHARAT ALI v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1942
• Mst. NASEEM MAI v. MASROOR ASHIQ KHAWAJA 2010 YLR 1945

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

famous lower court advocate from Tarbela lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes