Cases 6, 13 and 31 of the pre-trial case were dismissed by the trial court and the appellate court upheld the decision of the trial, failing to carry out the defamation case within two, due to the extremely weak property rights. The case will be extinguished. The plaintiff failed to overcome the regularity of the notice attached under section 31 (1) of the Punjab Pre-Impression Act 1991 under section 13 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1991, so it has It will be understood that after failing to make the consultation within a set period of two weeks from the notice, the material ff did not mention any time, date and location of the settlement. The appendix copy of the Notice of Sale Notice in Madinah cannot be corrected for the date, time and place of the error unless the student has indicated it to him as such. That the affidavit be sought can be proved only if the contradictions in the statements of the witnesses are mentioned at the same time, date and mention, except for permission to present the secondary evidence in court. Plaintiff's placement in a suit for premature discrimination was non-existent, because in the absence of a proper date, place and time, the period provided in section 13 (3) of the Punjab Pre-Impression Act 1991 could not be made. Be properly calculated below The courts did not take any illegal action or modify the status quo to validate the intervention to guarantee material misconduct.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
