Find a Lawyer

HAFIZ MUHAMMAD SHAHID NAWAZ versus HAFIZ MUHAMMAD SAEED

Sections 13 and 13 An eviction request was made by the landlord's father leasing the tenant as his former owner when his father intended to remain the tenant after the transfer of the shop to his landlord. The transfer of the shop in favor of was established by the documentary film, the evidence presented by it was not presented by the tenant nor was any one present on the present matter in the interest of the landlord's father. In effect, filing a eviction application was sufficient notice of a change of ownership in favor of the landlord, after which the tenant had such an application The tenant is not entitled to explain the tenancy of the shop and cannot be relinquished from its entry as a tenant. Once the tenant is always the tenant, the relationship of the landlord and tenant is not ruled out. The withdrawal request was accepted when he did not change the tenant's status. \ R \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• Syed SHAJJAR ABBAS SHAH v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1935
• SHAHNAZ BIBI v. State 2010 YLR 1937
• Mst. SAEED BIBI v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, JAMPUR, DISTRICT RAJANPUR 2010 CLC 1938
• SHAH NAWAZ v. ABDUL RAZZAQ 2010 MLD 1939
• MUHAMMAD ASIM alias BASHARAT ALI v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1942
• Mst. NASEEM MAI v. MASROOR ASHIQ KHAWAJA 2010 YLR 1945
• Mst. TAHIRA SHAMIM v. SHAHID RANA 2010 CLC 1945
• MUHAMMAD ASIF v. State 2010 YLR 1948

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

immigration advocates contact from Khurian wala lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes