MUHAMMAD ZAHID KHAN versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, RAJANPUR
Section 5, Schedule and Section 19 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional effect of restoration of constitutional application The conclusions of the courts below the plaintiff have imposed a fine of Rs 2,000 per month on himself and his three minor sons. Sued for rehabilitation at the rate of. His son fights for the plaintiff's rehabilitation and expenses because the plaintiff left his defendant's home and went to his parents' home. The plaintiff also sued for the restoration of marital rights. The trial court ruled on the plaintiff's case from July 1, 2008, to recovering Rs.1000 1000 rupees per head every year as long as his entitlement also included the costs of stabilizing the son. And the filing order for the restoration of rights subject to payment of maintenance allowance and delivery costs should be omitted. On appeal, the delivery charge of Rs 10,000 was reduced to Rs 2000 and the defendant was directed to collect the court fee. The cost of the case is Rs. 34,000 within two weeks, in which it failed. It is said that this appeal will be dismissed, the increase in maintenance allowance prices, where the price of each article of use per day has not increased, cannot be called strict and the parents of the children have to take care of them. Was banned, the appellate court ordered the defendant to attach a court fee on the cost of the trial as the court fee of Rs 34,000 was Rs 15 on the appeal. Which was in accordance with section 19 of the West Pakistan Family Act, 1964 (as amended by the Family Courts (Amendment) Ordinance (LV of 2002)) in relation to the High Court restitution allowance.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
