MST. RIFFAT ASGHAR versus STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN
Sections 79 and 123 of the insured's widow filed with the insurance tribunal to collect the insurance money, with which the evacuation insurance company filed a request on the basis that the insurance policy was obtained by concealing the facts and It was investigated by an authorized person under section 79. Insurance Ordinance, 2000, which was rejected by the Insurance Tribunal as requested by the Insurance Tribunal, was not admissible pursuant to the provisions of the Insurance Ordinance 2000, according to the report that the officer who prepared the report had retired and Not submitted for the following reasons, the record does not describe the facts which prepare the officer who prepared the report, without any cross-examination to such officer, the report is admissible in the eyes of the law Cannot make sure that the insurance policy material was obtained by the applicant's late husband. The company was not established by declaring Eq's arrest and fraud; during the course of the trial, the insurance company had investigated by its own doctor and the said doctor had not found anything which the applicant's late husband Refrain from issuing a policy in favor of The showcase notice was issued before the unauthorized order was passed. The High Court accepted the appeal and rejected the null decision and directed the insurance company to pay the claim amount to the applicant in accordance with the insurance policy.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
