Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM versus STATE

The abduction and compulsion of a woman on the basis of Section 497 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 365B, in her statement under Section 161, Cr PC under a grant of further investigation, states that she She had left her parents' house when the verdict was brought against her; she married the accused; she denied the story told in the FIR, in which she was asserted before the Additional Sessions Judge that she was the accused. She is freely married, the mother of the alleged kidnapper testifies of her puberty, and the challan column named after all the present circumstances has further investigated the accused's case. The accused was admitted on bail in the circumstances

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• JAMIL AHMAD SHEIKH v. Ch. ZAFAR IQBAL 2010 YLR 1257
• IRAM ZAHRA v. PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LIMITED through President/C.E.O., Headquarters, Islamabad 2010 PLC(CS) 1260
• AL-KHALIL COLD STORAGE v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Finance, Islamabad 2010 PTD 1260
• MAQBOOL AHMAD BHUTTA v. SECRETARY LOCAL GOVERNMENT 2010 PLC(CS) 1262
• UNITRADE IMPEX v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2010 CLC 1267
• DARBAR ABBAS SHAH v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1270
• WARIS ALI v. SECRETARY, LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, LAHORE 2010 YLR 1271
• ALLAH DITTA v. SHAMEER 2010 CLC 1273

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

property advocates from Lower Dir lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes