Find a Lawyer

BHUTTA versus STATE

Section 497 Governing Code (XLV of 1860), section 302/148/149 governing principle of immunity, a firearm was attributed to both defendants hitting the suspect's abdomen which caused isolation. Was also declared. The victim was shot in the stomach, the High Court had already granted bail. The accused's case was not related to the accused. The courts continued to consider the principle of consistency so that the accused could be treated equally. In this case, the role of the present accused was similar to that of the accused, which was granted bail by the High Court after the rule of consistency.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• IMRAN KHAN v. State 2010 YLR 2094
• ABDUL SABOOR v. State 2010 YLR 2096
• MUHAMMAD AKBAR v. State 2010 YLR 2097
• A.A. BROTHERS v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance (Revenue Division), Islamabad 2010 PTD 2101
• TANVIR ELAHI v. State 2010 YLR 2110
• MUHAMMAD SAEED v. DISTRICT JUDGE, VEHARI 2010 YLR 2112
• SAMI SALEEM BHATTI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Interior, Islamabad 2010 YLR 2114
• MUHAMMAD SALEEM v. State 2010 YLR 2115

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

registration advocate from Lalamusa lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes