Find a Lawyer

ABDUL SABOOR versus STATE

Section 365B Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 561A & 265K Petitioner's Appeal Counsel for abolishing and prosecuting the FIR believed that he had entered into a marriage contract with the alleged kidnapper. And this invoice was presented to the competent court. The applicants of the law should have been moved to the trial court for their success under Section Court K. The PC trial court had directed the High Court that if any petition in this regard was transferred, the law Will be dealt with within the same period.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• GUL ZAMIN KHAN v. JUSTICE OF PEACE/ ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, MIAN CHANNU DISTT. KHANEWAL 2010 YLR 2090
• MUHAMMAD SADIQUE KAMAL v. JUSTICE OF PEACE/ ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, KHANEWAL 2010 YLR 2091
• Syed RIAZ HUSSAIN v. State 2010 YLR 2093
• IMRAN KHAN v. State 2010 YLR 2094
• MUHAMMAD AKBAR v. State 2010 YLR 2097
• A.A. BROTHERS v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance (Revenue Division), Islamabad 2010 PTD 2101
• BHUTTA v. State 2010 YLR 2108
• TANVIR ELAHI v. State 2010 YLR 2110

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

best advocate from Tall lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes