Section 2 30b (b) / e 34 The convicted Empress was not present at the scene on the evidence evidence and had filed an FIR on the information given by other witnesses within five hours of filing the FIR. They were tried to cover the delay. The possibility of deliberations and consultations cannot be ruled out before the registration of an incomprehensible explanation does not prove to be a motive; only careful examination of the evidence must be made for the witnesses to be present at the time of the incident. Was not admissible under the circumstances given and the testimony of the occasion cannot be relied upon without any co-operation. Understanding children of age who were present at the scene with confession and were the most natural witnesses to the incident, were not involved in the investigation, nor were they presented by prosecution at trial. The ocular account was disputed by medical evidence, and the pistol obtained by the investigating officer was sent to the forensic science laboratory, the expert's report said, there was no significant value in the prosecution's case. The suspects were acquitted.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
