Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 489F implicitly canceling bail, applying for a guaranteed and imported order and bank statement statement, showed that the controversial check was issued in the year 2004 Was wrongly brought to the wrong place in which the bank authorities were properly located. Notified by defendant / accused And in support of the aforementioned dispute, a certified bank statement was issued by the defendants, which indicated that the applicant / complainant's solicitor's lawyer, due to the wrongdoing of the said check, His payment was stopped by, but he did not comment on the lawyer. For the respondents; it is common sense that an employer will borrow from the employee, the court did not agree with the applicant's lawyer not to mention the respondent's correct address in the FIR, where the respondent Ali was residing at a permanent address in the office. Her father was allotted a residence as an employee in the Railway Department, not satisfied with the petitioner's confirmation of the allegations leveled against the defendant in the FIR. Was unable to do. Respondent, who was rightly given to defendant because he was capable of providing such relief
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
