Find a Lawyer

ASHRAF HUSSAIN versus STATE

The Bank had dishonored the alleged refusal of a check of Rs. It was alleged that the FIR was heavy with a special character involved in the case. The accused was found to be issuing a check in the police investigation after the accused found that he was taking contradictory stands. The checkbook was lost and secondly, his checkbook was stolen by the complainant, who produced one. Such cases cannot be extended before extraordinary relief before the fake check in his name, although crime does not fall within the prohibited clause of section 497 (1) CRP, Cannot claim bail because it is non-existent. The previous conviction had no basis for grant of bail before the accused was denied bail in any case.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• DEFENCE HOUSING AUTHORITY through Secretary v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX 2010 PTD 2552
• Khawaja WASEEM HUMAYUN v. REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE, PUNJAB, LAHORE 2010 YLR 2562
• KASHIF MERAJ v. JUDGE FAMILY COURT 2010 YLR 2568
• MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN v. SHAHAB DIN 2010 YLR 2582
• ABDUL RAUF MINHAS v. AAMIR NOOR KHAN 2010 YLR 2592
• MAQBOOL AHMAD v. MUHAMMAD AWAIS QARNI 2010 YLR 2601
• FARHAT SHAMSHAD v. COURT OF NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU, LAHORE 2010 YLR 2604
• MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, P.S. SADAR, PAKPATTAN 2010 YLR 2611

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

list of advocates from Jhang lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes