Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MAQBOOL AHMAD versus MUHAMMAD AWAIS QARNI


A. XXXVII, R2 Law Implementation of Article 84 Suite, Comparison of Signatures for the Receipt Based on Proof (10 of 1984), Comparison of Scope Plaintiffs and Author of Pro Note and Receipt Supporter Notes Has been fully proven. The High Court, in exercise of the powers conferred under Article 84 of the Law Evidence, 1984, compared the signatures of the controversial pro-note and receipt pro-note with those on the written statement, responding to the bail bond, requesting a memorandum, oath By comparing the documents, pre-trial statements, court appeals, civil miscellaneous petitions and power of attorney and all these signatures, it was agreed that the pro-note and the receipt of the pro-note in the defendant's contentious signatures were substantially the same. On which the trial shows. The court was based on the correct definition of the evidence the appeal was excluded at all costs

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
tax advocates from Toru lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.