PETROSIN GAS PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. versus PAKISTAN STATE OIL
Article 199 An agreement was reached in the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court scope petitioner and respondent under which the applicant agreed to supply the LPG and establish an autogas station for the respondents. The alleged contract was, in fact, a license in which the applicant had no rights, and that the defendant, being a public limited company, had its own independent board of governors and was not capable of constitutional jurisdiction. Was. Was a public limited company owned and controlled by the federal government, therefore, the constitutional petition was viable. The High Court was empowered to scrutinize and abolish any order, if such order was exercised with arbitrary power, and the companies or institutes would provide vital services to citizens. Represents the federal government or any provincial government financing state to perform the tasks, therefore, actions and orders made by such companies or entities are subject to judicial review by the High Court under constitutional jurisdiction. ? The federal government-owned and controlled company was adorned with the important task of exploiting and developing the state's economic resources, enforcing the constitutional jurisdiction that state officials and entities were obliged to contract, both fine and non-exclusive Follow the rules of fairness, while the contract in question for granting or rescuing contracts has revealed that it was a contract and not a license that the applicant had invested too much toward contract performance. Legal option
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
