Find a Lawyer

ABDUL LATIF versus STATE

Section 2 302 (b) Definition of Evidence Immediately reporting the matter to the police eliminated the opportunity for false conspiracy or counseling. do not have. The eyewitnesses also belonged to the accused and they had no reason to make false accusations against him. The recovery of the integrated accountant knife, which has been found to be stained with human blood, was supported by the ocular version on the defendant's offer, in the case of the sole accused alternative, especially when there was no corruption against the complaining party. And the accused was also related to the complainant who was 17 years old at the time of the accident. The accident was not proved on record. The accused beat the 16/17 year old girl with ten knives on different parts of her body. He was brutally murdered and did not deserve any kind of relaxation.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• Mst. FARZANA alias SABA v. State 2010 YLR 2717
• Mst. KHURSHID BIBI v. LIAQAT ALI 2010 YLR 2729
• TAHIR v. State 2010 YLR 2732
• SULTAN AHMAD v. ALLAH DITTA 2010 YLR 2743
• PROVINCE OF PUNJAB v. MUHAMMAD IQBAL 2010 YLR 2759
• MUHAMMAD MANSHA KHAN v. State 2010 YLR 2764
• MEHMOOD ALI v. KHADIM HUSSAIN alias BAGH ALI 2010 YLR 2772
• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. State 2010 YLR 2780

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

how to become a advocate from Jauharabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes