ZUMMRUD KHAN, MANAGING DIRECTOR, PAKISTAN BAIT-UL-MAL versus GHULAM SYEDAIN RIZVI
Section 497 (5) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 420/409/468/471/109 Corruption Prevention Act (II of 1947), Section 5 Fraudulent, criminal breach of trust, fraud, fraudulent, false document Use, criminal misconduct, cancellation of the case was not wrong for anyone or the crime complainant started a scheme to help poor patients with hepatitis C and other pandemic diseases and the accused and his co-accused Timely manner and well-organized work robbed the public of the treasury, but the poorer patients with inflation still had the last hope of curing infectious diseases. He had been deprived, and thus facilitates the kind of terrible diseases spread, the charge of the hospital and other officials of procedures to serious violations. Patients accused of paying fake memo at fake subsidy rates had made fake purchases from unauthorized dealers even though the crimes mentioned in the FIR did not fall under the prohibited clause of Section 497 (1), CRPC. However, the accused and the accomplices had committed the crime. So complex, complicated and moment by moment, it was understood that no concession could be extended to them with the approval of the guarantee. The accused could not deny his responsibility as an Accounts Officer in one of the entire affairs and was personally and viciously liable for which the bail was granted. The circumstances were canceled by a special judge
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
