Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD IDREES versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN


Sections 2 (b) (a), 34, 55 and 133 (b) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 8 (3 (a), 199 (1) and 199 (3)). The contentious question of fact was that the petitioner was a member of the Petitioner Armed Forces, who was convicted and sentenced by a summary court martial sentence and sentenced by a summary court martial. Marshall was summoned in accordance with the provisions of Pakistan Army Act 1952, the procedure provided under the relevant law was followed and the applicant was found guilty and sentenced. B) The Pakistan Army Act, 1952, in which it was given full opportunity of trial and was eventually dismissed, failed to identify any jurisdictional error of the applicant and it had only disputed questions. Which were not considered by the High Court in the limited unusual jurisdiction.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates from Bisham lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.