Section 5 and the Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 204 constitutional petitioner challenged the proceedings in connection with the dissolution of marriage by a Judge Family Court, on the basis that it was approved by the aforesaid court. The decision and decision was not of any jurisdiction and it was not submitted to the court because under the transfer order the applicant had also criminally filed contempt of court against the petitioner's judge and It may be a disciplinary action that the High Court had passed an order on 4 12 2009 on the transfer request and both parties He was directed to appear before the Senior Civil Judge on September 15, 2009 and the aforesaid court submitted the case to the Judge Family Court but, somehow, the file was transferred to the Judge Family Court which requested him to transfer the case. The test was transferred to someone else. Judge Family Court and its negligence on the defendant's statement to dissolve the justification of the marriage, the decree passed, records show that both parties were present before the Judge Family Court and admitted the divorce and unknown. Signatures and thumb impressions on the first page of the order record also revealed that according to the post of assigning the case to the Judge Family Court, the Senior Civil Judge submitted the case to the Judge Family Court on 15 10 2009 and the parties referred to the case on 16 12 2009. Was directed to appear, therefore, it was not credible that since the exchange order order of the High Court was on 4 12 2009, its How could this be assigned? Judge Family Court Judge and Family Court Judge Senior Family Judge Referring to Family Court on 15 10 2009
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
