RANA PERVAIZ AKHTAR versus MUHAMMAD UMAR FAROOQ PASHA
In the interests of the plaintiffs in Articles 8 and 42, the case was filed for the declaration of cancellation of the registered sale deadline on the basis that it neither signed any document nor made any statement to the Registrar, nor Is there any consideration? The defendants for the disputed land also filed a case against the plaintiff in the interest of the plaintiff through specific performance of the contract, the trial court dismissed the decision to cancel the registered sale deed while the plaintiffs appealed on appeal. Court acquits court case Through separate rulings and orders, the defendants in both cases claimed that the plaintiff had failed to present the slightest evidence of the sale case even though they were aware of the fact that the evidence had caused them compassion. The plaintiffs failed to produce any. Minor testimony of the sale process to prove this sale was a fake and fabricated document with the plaintiffs, but they failed to perform such duty. Each party had to stand on its own feet and the plaintiff's evidence Failing to prove its case, the High Court on appeal dismissed the application as a power or fault of any jurisdiction.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
